| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
walmat |
Legion Ball |
Lead | |
|
Does anyone know if there is a legion team in Southeast Ohio that is available to the MVL kids? I don't think New Lex is going to have a 16-18 babe Ruth
team and we are looking to play some summer ball. Thanks
|
|||
newtransplant |
|||
|
I know Lancaster picked this summers team last fall. It may be hard to find a good, established legion team this year as it seems most of those seasons already
started last week. I wish we could have started this earlier as i know of a few Sheridan kids that were looking to play also. Would have been nice to combine
the PC schools...could probably field a very competitive team.
|
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I doubt there is room on the Zanesville Senior and Junior Legion teams now. Both have an ample number of players. At least one of the Juniors and one of the
Seniors are from Perry County (both from Crooksville HS).
The Junior team played a team from Glouster last week. They had decent numbers (just weren't very good -- all freshmen I think), and I think it's the first Legion team they've had there in many years. I don't believe there is a Senior team. Here's one thought, though -- why not approach the Legion posts in Perry County to pool their possible assets to sponsor at least a single Senior team? I know Somerset post used to sponsor the Sheridan 16-18 team. Roseville has long sponsored the BR teams down there. I really don't know how many Legion posts are in Perry County, and I certainly don't know their financial status, but that might be a way to get this done in the future. One thing for sure is that I wouldn't mind some games where we don't have to travel as far to play! We go to Athens, Newark and Upper Arlington this week alone, and have already played at Lancaster. Lord only knows that Perry County could certainly field a heckuva team if it had one. |
|||
ceramicfan |
|||
|
How old do you have to be for Jr. Legion? Senior Legion? And how do you get more information? Just for future reference. What about Stingers? What age group
makes up that team(s)?
|
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
Stingers' oldest group is U15. I think there is at least one younger division team, but I don't know age group. Todd Biles at 5B's is the contact
there if you want more info. It's his program. They play a lot in Columbus, especially on the weekends.
Legion baseball bases ages on what you turn during the calendar year (Babe Ruth, for example, is your age as of May 1 of each year). I think the minimum Legion age is 15, the maximum 19 (but just 18 for Junior Legion, I think; might be 17). The Old-Timers and Legion had worked out an agreement a couple years ago that BR would have the pick of 15s and the Legion the pick of 16s. There have been some exceptions to that (mea culpa, believe it or not), but it's been very, very few. Info on Legion is Dan Murphy, who heads the program and manages the Senior team. Paul Schluessler Jr. is the Junior team manager. |
|||
bludevil90 |
|||
|
The younger Stingers group is 13U. They tried to put together a 10U team but didn't have enought interest.
The 13U team plays in the COYBL (Central Ohio Youth Baseball League) and may play a couple of open tournaments in July. It is a good intermediate step between youth league and Babe Ruth. The mound is @ 54' and the bases are at 80'. They also have a very strict pitch count rule that is playing havoc with the rotation. You can observe a lot just by watching.
|
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I had my doubts about that modified distance. I coached a couple years of Babe Ruth 13s, though, and it's obvious that a good number of kids in that age
group are not quite ready to go to a full-sized diamond. From what I'm told, though, that 54-foot mound distance and 80-foot base distances really make it
more like a true game of baseball (speed, etc.) for kids who are generally right around that age-group's physical median.
|
|||
bludevil90 |
|||
|
I think for the 13's that this intermediate step is a good one. They get the feel of real baseball (balks, lead-off's, straight steals, squeeze plays,
etc), and the correlation of player speed and arm strength is pretty close to even!
You can observe a lot just by watching.
|
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
The only issue you run into, of course, are playing facilities. Here's one reason why I wish there were a couple of "centralized" baseball
facilities where you could have a couple regulation-sized diamonds and at least one modified diamond for this very purpose (by "centralized," I
don't necessarily mean Zanesville, but having them set in places where they would be accessible to virtually all BR / Summer programs). Or maybe there is
one place just for a couple modified diamonds, and you operate a single-location league at that site.
I just think an option such as this would be very beneficial to those kids who are not yet physically prepared to make those long throws across the diamond, who aren't yet strong enough to effectively get the ball from the mound to home plate efficiently enough to last more than a couple innings due to high pitch counts and fatigue. I truly think that sometimes that first year on the big diamond at 13 is more of a discouragement to many kids because it is such a struggle. The Ripken Division does also have a modified field (70-foot basepaths, for example) for it's top division, in an effort to help some kids begin that transition as 12-year-olds. I recall that Y-City was using that, or planning to do so. Anyone else around here do it? |
|||
newtransplant |
|||
|
before moving out here, our kids were involved in the COYBL league in Columbus beginning at age 9. That is now a part of the Nations Baseball organization,
which "competes" if you will, with the Little League Organization, USSSA, and CABA. There, the U9 and U-10 leagues play on 46/65 (pitch/base) fields.
U11 and U12 played on 70/50 and U 13 played on 80/54. I felt this progression was wonderful. At these distances, the full game (lead offs, stealing, pitching
from the stretch) was being implented/taught at a younger age.
As Zanes mentioned, playing facilities would be the big issue. In order to have fields that are proportionate with age and will grow in size with the players, a much larger complex would be needed . Most of the complexes elsewhere fall under the cities Parks and Recreation department where full staffs and budgets are available to maintain the upkeep. I'd love to see a nice complex built for this. I believe that it would greatly enhance the overall level of play at the high school levels. |
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I agree wholeheartedly. I think the sooner kids are able to learn the nuances of baserunning and such, as you noted, the better ballplayers they're going
to be ... and the more enjoyment they will get from the game.
Certainly, construction of a large complex is out of the question here. But perhaps there would be some way to partner with the schools and find spots to build a modified field. You'd need the commitment of all the youth leagues, regardless of affiliation, but I think it could be done. I also think having such an option would keep more kids in the game. I see kids dropping out around 12 and 13 years old, and I think sometimes it really has to do with those undersized kids getting tired of being dominated by the early-maturing kids. I think modified situation tends to level the playing field, so to speak, and while the "Little League studs" will still be good, the kids who have not yet had those hormones kick in can still compete. I think a lot of them bail out because they don't understand they'll all be generally "even" physically in a few years. I often wonder how many of those late-bloomers would have been solid baseball players had they stayed in the game. |
|||
bludevil90 |
|||
|
New & Zanes,
What is your thought(s) on the pitch count rule, rather than # of inings pitched? For us, if you pitch 50 pitches you are done for 2 days, and 80 pitches you are done for 5 days. You can observe a lot just by watching.
|
|||
newtransplant |
|||
|
devil, my experience was before the pitch count rule so my thoughts about it is based upon how I have heard it being administered. Although I certainly
understand the idea and purpose of the idea, it seems rather overkill to me, not to mention it being a nightmarish headache to try to manage (reports before
and during game to umps and opposing coaches?). Yes, there are coaches who will try to ride their stud pitcher who can throw BB's past lesser developed
kids. However, I don't remember it being a widespread issue. Instituting elaborate rules and procedures to nix a minority of offenders just seems like too
much to adopt. Now, I probably wouldn't have an issue if it was a "Number of Innings pitched" rule like most of the tournaments (as well as HS).
BTW...how are the tournaments being set up now? on pitch counts or Innings pitched?
Seems like by going to a pitch count rule, a team better have everyone on their roster able to pitch because I've seen games, especially at lower levels, where it takes 25 pitches to get 1 inning complete. That could get ugly pretty fast not to mention having the same minority of coaches make a mockery of the game by having their kids take pitches to drive the pitch counts up. in summary, not a fan of the pitch count rule to require a coach to do something a smart coach should be doing anyway, which is not blow his pitchers out at young age. Besides, 25 pitches on one kids arm will probably be different than 25 pitches on another kids arm. The body size and abilities are so wide at younger ages. |
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I think some combo of pitch count and innings at the lower levels is a wise choice. I'd leave that up to the alleged experts to decide, though.
The Babe Ruth rule is "one pitch = one inning." That does make for simple accounting (though I once had a kid come in, warm up, then pick off the kid at first to end the inning before throwing a pitch -- no inning, IMO, though others argued it counted since he got on the rubber and made a "throw." I really don't like the inning rule because, for one, many teams only have a few kids who can truly pitch (putting them at a competitive disadvantage by the end of each "pitching week") and some kids are fairly efficient where the pitch count is low but the inning count gets in the way (also had a kid walk out, throw three pitches, get three outs, but then burned a BR inning for the week. I mean, what if a kid goes out there on a Tuesday, throws all of 60 pitches in a 7-inning BR game? He's done for the week, though he could viably throw again on Friday or Saturday. But I do agree that a hard, fast pitch count doesn't take into account the difference in kids. I've had some where once they crest 50 pitches (and I do keep pitch counts, even from the sideline for the Junior Legion team), you know to start watching for fatigue issues. We just had one pitcher, Jaren Cooper, return after missing a year on the mound because of some elbow problems, so we have been pretty careful about his counts and slowly building on that. But we also have another kid, Jaymin Weaver, who really gets effective once he passes about 75 pitches, and seems like he could throw twice that. Bottom line it becomes the responsibility of the manager. Common sense should be the norm, and you can't legislate common sense. Kids, parents and coaches need to be actually "educated" about the issues. But I don't think anyone actually does it, so rules such as innnigs pitched and pitch counts have to be administered. |
|||
jkumpire |
|||
|
Kids do not throw enough. If more kids threw every day in the off season, even more soft toss, they would have fewer arm troubles, and be able to pitch more.
But then the other side of the coin is that kids are also not taught how to pitch with sound mechanics, the throw breaking pitches at too young an age, and some coaches over use their players. I personally don't like pitch counts, but if coaches would be careful of kids' arms to begin with, there would be no problem. |
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I think ALL kids need to have sound mechanics AS WELL AS learn how to develop a throwing routine. They all need to learn how to get warmed up properly, for
example. We've got one guy, honest to goodness, he feels "loose" after about 30 throws (not necessarily pitches) so he thinks he's ready to
go. And sure enough he tends to struggle the first few innings because he's not truly ready to go. Now, this is a kid who can throw all day long and never
complains of a sore arm. But he just doesn't understand why he really needs to go through a warm-up routine for a good 15 minutes or more to make sure
he's fully limber and truly "dialed in" from the START.
But you're right, JK. Kids don't throw that much anymore. We threw all the time when we were kids. Rarely did you hear of sore arms. And we were adamantly kept from trying to throw breaking pitches until we were 14 or so. Now I see kids twisting their arms at 11 and 12 (or even younger). GEEZ -- learn to throw strikes (in and out, up and down) and change speeds first!!! |
|||
newtransplant |
|||
|
It was mentioned before about trying to inquire about a Perry county legion team. Is there truly any interest in something like that? I'm afraid that some
of the legion teams will try out early again (Lancaster?). But I would rather have all of our kids play on a Perry County team if possible. Between NL,
Sheridan, Crooksville, I think we could field a team. Is anybody able to shed light on the Perry possibility? I guess one of the first things would be the
interest level and the second would be how/who to organize/solicite sponsorships. I don't know alot of people outside of the sheridan territory but would
be willing tohelp someone if we thought we could do this. If we don't think this could be done, then we need to keep our ears open as to when other teams
are trying out. I know alot of the travel teams in columbus are trying out this month.
|
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
Seems to me most of the Legion sponsorships in Perry County have been for Babe Ruth teams -- notably Roseville and Somerset. As I noted above, perhaps the
Posts in Perry County could be swayed to combine their efforts to begin a Legion baseball program down there.
Just thinking, but I believe there were only two Perry County kids involved on our Legion teams this summer -- Aaron Adams on the Senior team and Austen Erwin on the Junior team. The obvious reasoning, of course, would be travel time, even for the home games at ZHS. Couple that with the greater number of scheduled games and it's one heck of a commitment for any kid who lives in and around Zanesville let alone one who might live in New Lex or Somerset. Frankly, I'd like to see a Perry County entry in Legion ball, because there would be at least one road trip that wouldn't be a long one. And I feel that if Glouster can have at least a Junior team, Perry County could go that route, too. First problem: where would they play their home games? I would have to be either Crooksville or Sheridan HS, IMO, since there are so many BR teams that use the New Lex field. I only exclude Miller due to its more remote site in the county. |
|||
newtransplant |
|||
|
In addition to the 2 PC boys noted, I believe there were also 2 on the Jr. Pioneers roster and at least a couple that i know of that went into columbus this
summer. I also know of a few more who would have played legion ball if it was readily more available. Travel expense is a concern as well as the time
commitment. I'm not suggesting it is any different than in other communities, but many of the baseball players are heavily relied upon to contribute in the
other sports at their MVL schools. In order for it to work in Perry, I think there would need to be a pretty good number of kids to participate in order to
accomodate the requirements of the various "off-season" team activities (ie. camps etc).
Perhaps legion ball wouldn't be an exact fit for PC, but I think it is something that should be explored further. |
|||
ZanesVegas |
|||
|
I'd have to think about how the Zanesville Legion kids, about how many aren't solely baseball players. I think it's higher than it might seem. But
I do think that if such a team in Perry County was open to all four school districts, it's likely you'd find enough kids to form at least one team. It
is understandable, however, about kids' commitments. Not trying to be funny here, but we also don't have many kids with 4-H commitments here, either,
while that is much more prevalent down that way.
In actuality, travel for a Perry County team could be (should be) less than for ours (in terms of distances). As an example, our Juniors had road games this year at Athens, Glouster, Newark, Lancaster, Pickerington and Upper Arlington (the bulk of our schedule was at home this year, though we played a couple home games at West M, and a couple games in the Senior tournament at Muskingum University). We travelled a bit more the previous summer, which inlcuded all of the above except Glouster and UA, as well as trips to Chillicothe, Johnstown and Prospect (up near Marion). I think that's about it. So, really, a PC team would be much closer to these other posts. And to be honest, after tryouts and a couple of workouts, I don't recall the Juniors having any formal practices once the season began -- you end up playing so much there almost isn't much time for that. I figure it might be something worth exploring down there, if nothing else but to gauge interest on the part of the Legion itself and of potential players. |
|||
jkumpire |
|||
|
I am very sad to say that there is little hope of a Legion team in Perry County. The best players are playing other sports and Summer is conditioning for the
big sport in the county. I am not sure who would manage a team in the County as well. None of the school coaches can do it, and the best of the best assistant
coaches are tied up in Babe Ruth. My guess is that the Legion organizations in the County could sponsor a team finance-wise, but again, I just don't think
there is enough interest. I wish there was, and I wish we had more sport participants in the county.
|
|||